Saturday, December 14, 2013

Drone Strikes in Pakistan

From:  The New York Times 

COMMENT - Isn't it amazing they can't understand why Pakistanis resent having drones murder toddlers? 

To the Editor:
Re “Visiting Pakistan, Hagel Seeks to Shore Up Alliance” (news article, Dec. 10):
If the United States is serious about addressing Pakistan’s outrage over continued drone strikes, it needs to start by investigating potentially unlawful drone killings.
Across the border in Afghanistan, an American military commander apologized after a drone strike allegedly killed a toddler last month and pledged an investigation. Yet in Pakistan, the United States has never taken such steps.
The United States’ silence on killings is speaking volumes. Instead of clinging to official secrecy about a killing program of the Central Intelligence Agency that has grown notorious, the administration should commit to investigations and accountability for unlawful drone killings. 

NAUREEN SHAH
Washington, Dec. 11, 2013
The writer is advocacy adviser at Amnesty International USA and the author of several reports on drone strikes.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Embedded real-time operating system software secures military mission-critical data from growing threats

From:  Military & AeroSpace

COMMENT - This company is owned by Dan O'Dowd and his wife, who together own 97% of Green Hills Software, Inc., and other corporations which were created for reasons on which it is entirely fair to speculate. 


March 30, 2012











Posted by Courtney Howard
TECHNOLOGY FOCUS, 30 March 2012. The adoption of secure real-time operating system (RTOS) software and related embedded computing security software tools for military embedded systems continues to grow, driven by increased security threats and concerns, real and perceived.
Many pundits agree that the need for information security, especially for critical and classified data, as well as the computing and data storage systems on which it resides, has never been greater. Industry has responded with myriad innovations designed to deliver security and protection at not only the system level, but also at the embedded, component level.
<SCRIPT language='JavaScript1.1' SRC="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N4617.Milaero.com/B7529579;abr=!ie;sz=300x250;click0=http://ads.pennnet.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/MAE.pennnet.com/Articles/L24/1699622767/Middle/PennWell/panasonic_mae_art_spons/panasonic_mae_300x250tags_032713.html/69756b3563564b6f6a3177414144696d?;ord=1699622767?"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://ads.pennnet.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/MAE.pennnet.com/Articles/L24/1699622767/Middle/PennWell/panasonic_mae_art_spons/panasonic_mae_300x250tags_032713.html/69756b3563564b6f6a3177414144696d?http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N4617.Milaero.com/B7529579;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;ord=1699622767?"> <IMG SRC="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N4617.Milaero.com/B7529579;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;ord=1699622767?" BORDER=0 WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=250 ALT="Advertisement"></A> </NOSCRIPT>
“There is no single architecture, product, or capability that can protect against a continuously evolving threat landscape,” cautions Chip Downing, senior director of Aerospace & Defense at Wind River in Alameda, Calif. “Today’s connected systems need to integrate a wide range of capabilities to achieve continuous security in hostile network environments. Layered, proven security components, along with capabilities to update these system components, need to be integrated to enable continuous application and service availability, while maintaining the required security capability.”
A layered security approach to critical systems and components is just one of Downing’s recommendations to aerospace and defense enterprises and end users. The most important considerations in the selection of an RTOS for aerospace and defense applications, he says, are support for open standards, safety certification, security features, and virtualization support. If a system needs to meet high levels of safety and security assurance, systems designers must have a strategy to achieve these requirements, he says.
“Due to higher system complexity and compressed system budgets, an RTOS with commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) certification evidence is the wisest choice," Downing says. "COTS certification evidence removes significant certification risk whilst lowering program costs."
Aerospace and avionics
“Avionics and aerospace systems have requirements for safety-critical software, and now are requiring security to help prevent malicious fault conditions,” says Robert Day, vice president of LynuxWorks in San Jose, Calif. “DOD [U.S. Department of Defense] environments require security, especially when connected to other systems or networks, which is becoming the norm even in tactical deployments.”  MORE

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

INTEGRITY Global Security, or Insecurity for Freedom, more accurately

From:  Integrity Global Security


COMMENTS - After spending time in government the elite, you can read this as 'those on the take,' are recycled into lucrative positions in 'the private sector,' though no one in their right mind should think of government contractors as 'private.' 

Here is the Advisory Board for INTEGRITY, which is the property of Dan O'Dowd, whose first venture into the world of BIG MONEY through efficient fascism, founded in 1982, is Green Hills Software, Inc. 

From INTEGRITY site: 

eet the INTEGRITY Global Security Board of Advisors:
Robert R. Ridout, Former Vice President & CIO, Dupont Corporation
Robert DeRodes, Former Executive Vice President, First Data
C. Thomas McMillen, Chairman and CEO, Homeland Security Capital Corporation
General Eugene E. Habiger, USAF, Ret.
Robert (Bob) Ridout, Former Vice President & CIO, Dupont Corporation; Customer Board Member Microsoft, HP, AT&T, Lotus, and IBM
Robert (Bob) Ridout was Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the DuPont Company for more than ten years. He held several executive positions in Information Technology in addition to assignments in field sales, manufacturing and customer service since joining DuPont in 1968. He was a member of the prestigious Research Board, and has served on Microsoft, HP, AT&T, Lotus and IBM customer boards. Currently he provides strategic advice to the executives and large customers of CSC and Salesforce.com. He is a member of the Supervisory Board of Cordys, a global business process management company headquartered in Europe, and is on the Advisory Board of INTEGRITY Global Security, a company leveraging its highly secure technology used in defense and intelligence applications for commercial use.
As CIO at DuPont, Mr. Ridout was responsible for overall operation and direction of Information Technology within DuPont globally, earning the reputation for the group that "IT works." He oversaw the IT organizations in the company's 20 strategic business units (SBU's) and global regions involving several thousand DuPont and IT Alliance employees. Mr. Ridout centralized IT budget and resource responsibility for DuPont globally, implementing the required governance, financial and personnel processes for a mature organization. He led one of the industry's largest SAP programs for all of DuPont's businesses and functions in hundreds of sites worldwide. This resulted in significant working capital reductions, improved customer service and a foundation of standardization across DuPont.
Mr. Ridout served as DuPont's Corporate Process Owner for Intellectual Property Protection, Records Management and Privacy Protection, and he was an executive leader in the company's drive to manage by high level business processes. He was also the leader in effectively using outsourced operations.
Mr. Ridout was a key leader in the chemical industry cyber security program and served as an advisor on the strategic use of IT to the US Department of Homeland Security. He was named I.T. Executive of the Year by the Lattanze Center for Excellence, recognizing his leadership role in eBusiness. Mr. Ridout was also named CIO of the Year by UBS for DuPont's coordinated SAP program.
Mr. Ridout has a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics from the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, VA. He currently resides in Kennett Square, PA.

Robert (Bob) DeRodes, Former Executive Vice President, First Data; Former Executive Vice President and CIO, The Home Depot; Former CEO, Delta Technology, Former CIO Delta Air Lines
Robert (Bob) DeRodes is an accomplished senior executive with 40 years professional experience working for an impressive list of major multi-national corporations and top industry leaders. Mr. DeRodes is a recognized leader in information technology and business operations with an established track record for transformational change, innovation, and execution inside large corporations. Executive experience spans the banking, payments, insurance, retail, and transportation industries.
Mr. DeRodes recently served as First Data's executive vice president, global operations and technology. In this role, Mr. DeRodes was responsible for product delivery; customer service delivery; technology infrastructure operations; print, mail, and card plastics production; customer conversions; procurement; real estate; and enterprise security and compliance for the global enterprise operating in 34 countries.
He previously served as executive vice president and chief information officer for The Home Depot, where he was responsible for leading the company's technology transformation. Mr. DeRodes also served as chief executive officer for Delta Technology, Inc. and chief information officer for Delta Air Lines. In these roles, he was responsible for $1.2 billion in servicing revenue and all aspects of global technology and communications for the airline's operations.
Prior to Delta, Mr. DeRodes was chief technology officer for Citibank N.Y. Global Card Products Group, where he was responsible for the development and implementation of a global cards technology platform. In addition, he has led IT solutions and service delivery for other innovative companies such as The Sabre Group, a subsidiary of AMR Corporation and for United States Automobile Association (USAA).
Mr. DeRodes has been a senior advisor to the Center for CIO Leadership, the Department of Homeland Security, and to the Secretary of Defense. He sits on the board of directors for publically-held NCR and privately-held Veracode. Mr. DeRodes was named one of 25 top technology officers by Information Week 2006 and was awarded 2005 Information Services executive of the year by the Lattanze Center at Loyola College Maryland.
A native of Wooster, Ohio, DeRodes earned a bachelor's of science degree in business administration from St. Louis University and a master's of business administration degree from the University of Texas in Austin.

C. Thomas McMillen, Chairman and CEO, Homeland Security Capital Corporation; Vice Chairman, Fortress International Group, Inc.; Chairman and Co-CEO, Secure America Acquisition Corp., former three-term Congressman from Maryland
McMillenheadshot "From the finance sector to our military, from energy companies to our intelligence agencies, our nation relies upon a vast, interdependent web of information technology systems. Every day this infrastructure is under cyber-siege. The tools we have deployed now to defend against these attacks simply cannot defeat the sophisticated enemies we now face—organized crime, corporate spies, foreign intelligence services. According to the General Accountability Office, cyber-crime costs the U.S. economy at least $117 billion each year. These attacks may be virtual, but the barbarians are not at the gates, they are inside our systems.
That is about to change. INTEGRITY Security offers American government and business the ability to effectively protect their information and operations against even the most determined attacks. For the last three years the experts at the NSA, the best in the world, worked hard to break the INTEGRITY System. They had the source code, they had all the information possible, and, yet, they couldn't defeat INTEGRITY. We need INTEGRITY protecting all our vital government and corporate information and information systems."
Tom McMillen has served as the company's Chairman & CEO since August 2005. He serves as Vice Chairman of Fortress International Group Inc., formerly Fortress America Acquisition Corporation, a company that designs, builds and maintains mission-critical facilities and trades on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol FIGI. McMillen also serves as Chairman & Co-CEO of Secure America Acquisition Corporation, a special purpose acquisition corporation focused on the Homeland Security and trades on the America Stock Exchange under the ticket symbol HLD.
Previously, McMillen co-founded and served as CEO of Global Secure Corp., a homeland security company providing integrated products and services for critical-incident responders. He was appointed by President Clinton to Co-Chair the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports from 1993 to 1997. From 1987 through 1993, McMillen served three consecutive terms in the United States House of Representatives from the 4th Congressional District.
McMillen graduated from the University of Maryland with a BS in Chemistry. He earned a BA and MA from University College, Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar.

General Eugene E. Habiger, USAF, Ret.; Former Commander in Chief, US Strategic Command; Former Director of Security and Emergency Operations, US Department of Energy; Former President and CEO San Antonio Water System
Habinger "Cyber security has historically been a battle between an offensive capability (hack) that has generally been ahead of the defense (deny). This fact of life was made painfully aware to me while serving as Commander-In -Chief of US Strategic Command and as Security Czar for the Secretary of Energy. Today, that traditional paradigm has literally been turned upside down with the unprecedented EAL 6+ High Robustness certification by the National Security Agency for Integrity Solutions' partitioned real-time operating systems. Cyber warfare has truly emerged around the world as an operational weapon of mass disruption and Integrity's innovative technological tools have clearly put the defense of our government and commercial systems on a level of security virtually unknown up this point."
General Eugene E. Habiger, USAF, Ret. has more than 35 years of experience in national security and nuclear operations. In his previous assignment as the Commander in Chief of United States Strategic Command, he was responsible for all U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy strategic nuclear forces supporting the national security strategy of strategic deterrence. In this position, he established an unprecedented military-to-military relationship with his Russian counterparts, which resulted in extraordinary confidence building and openness. This initiative was the centerpiece of a 60 Minutes II segment in February 2000 and a CNN special in October 2000.
General Habiger is a Distinguished Fellow and Policy Adviser with the University of Georgia's Center for International Trade and Security where he assists with the Center's international programs aimed at preventing weapons proliferation and reducing nuclear dangers.
Prior to joining the Center, General Habiger was the President/CEO of the San Antonio Water System, where he was responsible for the general operations of the System along with the strategic long-range business and water resources planning for the ninth largest city in the United States. He also worked as the Department of Energy's Director of Security and Emergency Operations. As the Department's "Security Czar", he was charged by the Secretary with changing the security culture at the Energy Department and establishing a program to reenergize and restore confidence in the Department's Security Program.
He is a command pilot with more than 5,000 flying hours, primarily in bomber aircraft. During the Vietnam War, he flew 150 combat missions.
He is also the Chairman of the Board of the Armed Services YMCA, serves on the Fisher House Foundation of San Antonio and is a Senior Fellow with the Gorbechev Foundation.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

All Drone Politics Is Local

From:  David Swanson

COMMENT - The anti-drone action is spreading.  This is from the Swanson coalition, of which Drone Free Zone is a part.  Get ready to Occupy Drone Contractors! 

By David Swanson

What Localities and States Can Do About Drones
Charlottesville, Va., passed a resolution that urged the state of Virginia to adopt a two-year moratorium on drones (which it did), urged both Virginia and the U.S. Congress to prohibit information obtained from the domestic use of drones from being introduced into court, and to preclude the domestic use of drones equipped with "anti-personnel devices, meaning any projectile, chemical, electrical, directed-energy (visible or invisible), or other device designed to harm, incapacitate, or otherwise negatively impact a human being," and pledged that Charlottesville would "abstain from similar uses with city-owned, leased, or borrowed drones."
St. Bonifacius, Minn., passed a resolution with the same language as Charlottesville plus a ban on anyone operating a drone "within the airspace of the city," making a first offense a misdemeanor and a repeat offense a felony.
Evanston, Ill., passed a resolution establishing a two-year moratorium on the use of drones in the city with exceptions for hobby and model aircraft and for non-military research, and making the same recommendations to the state and Congress as Charlottesville and St. Bonifacius.
Northampton, Mass., passed a resolution urging the U.S. government to end its practice of extrajudicial killing with drones, affirming that within the city limits "the navigable airspace for drone aircraft shall not be expanded below the long-established airspace for manned aircraft" and that "landowners subject to state laws and local ordinances have exclusive control of the immediate reaches of the airspace and that no drone aircraft shall have the 'public right of transit' through this private  property," and urging the state and Congress and the FAA "to  respect legal precedent and constitutional guarantees of privacy, property rights, and local sovereignty in all matters pertaining to drone aircraft and navigable airspace."
See full text of all resolutions at warisacrime.org/resolutions
Other cities, towns, and counties should be able to pass similar resolutions. Of course, stronger and more comprehensive resolutions are best. But most people who learned about the four resolutions above just leaned that these four cities had "banned drones" or "passed an anti-drone resolution." The details are less important in terms of building national momentum against objectionable uses of drones.  By including both surveillance and weaponized drones, as all four cities have done, a resolution campaign can find broader support.  By including just one issue, a resolution might meet fewer objections.  Asking a city just to make recommendations to a state and the nation might also meet less resistance than asking the city to take actions itself.  Less can be more.
Localities have a role in national policy. City councilors and members of boards of supervisors take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States. Cities and towns routinely send petitions to Congress for all kinds of requests. This is allowed under Clause 3, Rule XII, Section 819, of the Rules of the House of Representatives. This clause is routinely used to accept petitions from cities, and memorials from states. The same is established in the Jefferson Manual, the rulebook for the House originally written by Thomas Jefferson for the Senate. In 1967, a court in California ruled (Farley v. Healey, 67 Cal.2d 325) that "one of the purposes of local government is to represent its citizens before the Congress, the Legislature, and administrative agencies in matters over which the local government has no power. Even in matters of foreign policy it is not uncommon for local legislative bodies to make their positions known." Abolitionists passed local resolutions against U.S. policies on slavery. The anti-apartheid movement did the same, as did the nuclear freeze movement, the movement against the PATRIOT Act, the movement in favor of the Kyoto Protocol, etc. No locality is an island. If we become environmentally sustainable, others will ruin our climate. If we ban assault weapons, they'll arrive at our borders. And if the skies of the United States are filled with drones, it will become ever more difficult for any city or state to keep them out.
How to pass a local resolution: Every city or county is different, but some rules of thumb are applicable. To the extent possible, build understanding of the issues.  Invite speakers, screen films, hold conferences.  To the extent possible, educate and win over elected officials.  Make the case that localities have a responsibility to speak on national issues to represent the interests of local people.  Make the case that the time to act is before the problem expands out of control. Most states are considering drone legislation, so refer to that activity in your state. Make clear that you are aware of countless benevolent and harmless uses of drones but that you are prioritizing Constitutional rights and want exceptions made for uses that do not endanger self-governance rather than drones being made the norm and restrictions the exception. The Congressional Research Service says drones are incompatible with the Fourth Amendment. The U.N. Special Rapporteur says drones are making war the norm.  If possible, propose the weakest resolution you can, and ask the local government to put it on the agenda for consideration; then propose the strongest possible resolution you dare.  You may end up with a compromise, as happened in Charlottesville. Work the local media and public. Pack the meeting(s). Take advantage of every opportunity for the public to speak. Unlike at the state or national levels, you are unlikely to face any organized opposition. Make your most persuasive case, and make a great show of public support. Equate a "No" vote with support for cameras in everyone's windows and armed drones over picnics. Equate a "Yes" vote with prevention of racial profiling, activist profiling, and the targeting of all sorts of groups that can be recruited into your campaign.
STATES: See full text of all resolutions at warisacrime.org/resolutions
Oregon has passed a law banning weaponized drones in all cases and banning drone use by law enforcement unless they have a warrant, they have probable cause without a warrant, or for search and rescue, or for an emergency, or for studying a crime scene, or for training (and the Fourth Amendment be damned).
Virginia has passed a law banning local and state (but not federal or National Guard) government drone use for two years unless various color-coded alerts are activated or there is a search or rescue operation or for training exercises or for drone-training schools, and strictly banning (for two years) any state or local weaponized drones.
Florida has passed a law banning law enforcement agencies from using drones to gather information unless they think they have some sort of reason to do so (and the Fourth Amendment be damned).
Idaho has passed a law banning drone surveillance "absent reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal conduct" except in pursuit of marijuana in which case no such suspicion is needed (and the Fourth Amendment be damned).
Illinois has passed a law banning drones except for law enforcement agencies that have a warrant or when the Secretary of Homeland Security shouts "terrorism!" or they are reasonably suspicious it's needed or are searching for a missing person or are photographing a crime scene or traffic crash scene (and the Fourth Amendment be damned).
Tennessee has passed a law banning law enforcement drones unless the Sec. of Homeland Security shouts "terrorism!" or there's a warrant or there's suspicion without a warrant (and the Fourth Amendment be damned).
Texas has passed a law banning the capturing of images with drones except for ... too many exceptions to list.
Congressman Grayson passed an amendment to a DHS funding bill banning DHS from using weaponized drones, a step that must be repeated each year for this and other agencies unless a full national or international ban is put in place.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Iran to teach drone-hunting to school students

From:  The Guardian

COMMENT - Now, are they going to provide tutorials online and will they include contractor hunting on the curriculum?  

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) รข€” Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guards paramilitary units plan to teach drone-hunting to school students, an Iranian newspaper reported Monday.
The report by pro-reform Etemad daily quoted Gen. Ali Fazli, acting commander of the Guard's Basij militia, as saying the new program will be taught as part of a "Defensive Readiness" lesson in high schools from late September.
He did not elaborate but the plan suggests students would be taught how to track and bring down drone aircraft by hacking their computer systems.
Iranian hardliners have long sought a larger role for the military in the country's education system. Students at both junior and senior high schools currently take courses focusing on "civil defense."
Iran captured a U.S. RQ-170 Sentinel drone in 2011 after it entered Iranian airspace. Since then, Tehran says it has seized more U.S. drones, including a Boeing-designed ScanEagle.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

5 Myths Used to Justify Death By Drone and America's Assassination Policy

From:  AlterNet 

By Robert Greenwald

Obama's drone war relies on propaganda to keep the American public from understanding the inhumanity of high-tech drone killings.

America’s never-ending war on terrorism is almost always depicted in the mainstream media as a military and intelligence agency fight on a global battlefield. But it is also a propaganda war where the public is fed inaccuracies from Washington, especially when it comes to overseas killings by U.S. military drones.
Here are five myths perpetuated by the military and its weapons makers that seek to make Americans feel good about drones and the White House’s policy of targeted assassinations.
 Myth #1: They Target High Level Terrorists
Only two percent of drone strikes have killed “high value targets,” former counter-terror advisor to David Patreus, David Kilcullen, notoriously remarked in a New York Times column early in the Obama presidency, where he said that 50 civilians were killed for every “high-value target” assassinated. That means that 98 percent of drone-caused deaths have been a mix of low-level militants, civilians, or another dubious Pentagon classification called “unknown militants.”   MORE


Saturday, August 10, 2013

Anti-war leaders condemn U.S. drone strikes on Yemen


COMMENT - It is good to see at least one drone corporation being identified as a purveyor of death.

Minneapolis, MN – Meredith Aby of the Twin Cities-based Anti-War Committee condemned the escalating wave of U.S. drone strikes in Yemen, stating, “There have been eight drone attacks in the past two weeks in Yemen which have killed more than 30 people. The U.S. is waging an undeclared war in Yemen and increasing the anger at the U.S. for its use of drones on civilians. It is particularly insulting to our sisters and brothers in the Muslim world that this escalation of drone strikes has corresponded with the end of Ramadan and the celebration of Eid. The president claims these drone strikes make us safer, when in fact they do the opposite. The people of Yemen see these attacks for what they are – acts of imperialism.”
Joe Iosbaker, of the Anti-War Committee-Chicago, said of the drone strikes, “In May, President Obama told us that the U.S. use of drone warfare would be declining, but clearly that’s not happening. There is no real change in the Obama doctrine of drone war. According to the U.S., we can strike into any country at any time. This is the unlawful behavior of an imperialist country.”
Iosbaker and Aby are helping to organize the Midwest Action Against Drones (MAAD) scheduled for Sept. 29 – 30, under the slogans 'End Drone Warfare Abroad and Spying at Home', 'No Killer Drone for Boeing', 'No New Wars on Iran and Syria', and 'Money for Jobs, Healthcare, and Education – Not for War'.
On Sept. 28, at 3:00 p.m. protesters will gather in Chicago’s Millennium Park for a rally and march to Boeing Headquarters. On Sept. 29, from 9:30 a.m. until 3:00 p.m., there will be a conference featuring workshops and activists and organizers from across the Midwest region.



Source: http://www.fightbacknews.org/2013/8/10/anti-war-leaders-condemn-us-drone-strikes-yemen