From: Story Leak
COMMENT - Yes, and given how chummy they all are don't doubt for a moment political dissidents will be first on the list. Green Hills, that demonic droning contractor, is probably assembling its own list now.
While not on United States soil, the deaths of the US citizens in nations like Yemen and Pakistan highlight the new precedent being set by US government heads who wish to use drones as a form of lethal enforcement on US soil. With Holder admitting that Americans have already died via drone strikes following his statements that Obama can already
initiate drone strikes on US soil, we are now seeing the way paved to
go ahead and announce armed drones to fight terrorism here in the US.
We all remember the initial rhetoric that drones were ‘no real
threat’, and that they were simply unarmed scouting machines used to save lives overseas.
Then, we saw them rapidly enter the nation,
and we heard the same tired reassurances. We saw them killing innocents
overseas with the high powered weaponry being attached to these
‘scouting’ drones, and we see them still doing so today. But, once
again, we’re told not to worry. Political talking heads like Eric Holder
assure us that domestic drones, for which over 1,400 permits have
been issued, are not meant to be used as weapons. Well, that is unless
Obama decides to use the drones as a weapon of war on US soil.
Armed Domestic Drones In The Near Future
Despite the message of assurance regarding the promise that domestic
drones would never turn into government-controlled war machines, Eric
Holder decided to go ahead and announce that it would actually be
entirely ‘legal’ for Obama to issue a drone strike on a US citizen on
domestic soil. In fact, CNN
reports that Holder does not ‘rule out’ the possibility of domestic
drone strikes, and that a scenario could occur in the future. And to
strike someone with a drone, of course, you would need weaponry. You would need an armed drone.
In other words, Holder is going against the major promise by the FAA official who ‘promised’
that no armed drones will be flying on domestic soil. But don’t worry,
Holder says the government has ‘no intention’ right now of issuing drone
strikes on US soil. Just like the government never targeted
Constitution and conservative-based groups through the IRS
and would never use domestic drones to spy on you. Quite simply, if any
power is given to these individuals in government, be sure of one
thing: they will use it.
And knowing the track record of drone strikes overseas and how they
greatly affect the innocent, drone strikes on US soil against citizens
is an even more serious threat. The 3,000 plus deaths from drone strikes
overseas in Pakistan alone, which vastly affect the innocent and
non-threatening, have even prompted Google employees and big firms alike
to develop charts and interactive maps to detail the deaths in a manner
that portrays the reality of the situation. One design firm known as
Pitch recently went and created an interactive chart that, along with detailing how less than 2% of strike victims are high priority targets, documents the drone strike deaths throughout recent years.
We continue to hear these major announcements from Holder regarding
drone strikes, and each time it pushes the precedent further. Each time,
he warps the ‘law’ to justify what is being done with drone attacks,
and each time we come closer to the announcement that we ‘need’ to use
armed drones against domestic terrorists. Just wait for the next
terrorist hunt in the US for a high profile crime case to hear more from
Holder and the gang on why we need armed domestic drones to keep us
safe. It already happened with Dorner and others.
No comments:
Post a Comment