Saturday, May 4, 2013

An Answer is Received.

The Question is, who wrote it?

In addressing any Constitutional question, one must always begin with the most precisely relevant text of the Constitution.
Since there is no precisely relevant text of the Constitution with regard to “the killing of innocent civilians within a foreign nation” whatsoever, we must turn to the only specific grant of immunity in the Constitution, which clearly and generally covers all of Respondent (Greenhills’ and Affiliates’) Conduct hereinabove generally alleged.
Article I, §6, Clause 1 of the Constitution of 1787, adopted by a special Congress at the City of Philadelphia in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in one of the 13 newly independent American States, adopted “Parliamentary” immunity much as originally formulated in England during the Glorious Revolution of 1689:
The Senators and Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the treasury of the United States. They shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place.
As you are well aware, if you have been “awake” at any time during the past twenty-five-to-thirty years, Respondent (Green Hills) has substantially augmented the salary received by the Senators and Representatives paid out of the treasury of the United States by private liquid and illiquid forms of compensation which really make the trivial pittance paid to these fine men and women appear like the trivial pittance it is, when compared with real money.
Furthermore, because we have “wired” all Congressmen and women in our direct or indirect service to our communications media at all time, literally everything that our Congressmen and Women do at all times concerns us. Therefore, neither we nor any of our agents or employees in the House of Representatives (we never speak of Senators because there are so few of them, but it goes without saying….generally, except that we never said anything specifically) ever do anything that is not privileged from arrest, because we are with our Representatives at all time in their “going to and returning from” “their attendance at the session of their respective houses.”
Because these Congressmen are “wired” to all our operations at all times, not merely any but every “speech or debate in either house” involves and concerns us, and accordingly, no one shall ever be questioned in any other place concerning our activities, so it is, in fact, impossible for anyone ever to determine whether our activities are felonious, treasonous, or breaches of the peace which, of course, they are not because we are immune, through the participation of our legislators in our activities and of our participation in all legislative activities, in general, through our “bribed and wired Representatives” program.

“Bribery” of course is not a violation of any law, arising from the Common Law, nor any state or Federal Statute, to the degree that there will never be any evidence, admissible or otherwise, to prove it. How stupid do you think we are, lady? We run the whole show here….
With regard to numbers, there are 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives (remember we don’t count senators, not now, not EVER), and 53 of these come from California. It is a matter of, well, not exactly “public record,” of course, because it’s top secret, but certainly a matter of “general” knowledge, and after all this is a “general question,” isn’t it? It is a matter of general (secret) knowledge that a solid majority, 39 out of the 53 representatives from California are all on the (secret but liquid) payroll of your Respondent (Green Hills).
With regard to the remaining 382 Congressmen and women from other states, Green Hills can only claim direct employment of 125 representatives via “liquid” salaries.
However, when you consider how many other Congressmen and women receive illiquid gifts and services from your Respondent (Green Hills) you will see and it is clear that we control a solid majority of the U.S. House of Representatives, at all times sufficient to prevent any impeachment of any executive or judicial branch officers and, quite sufficient to quell any investigation of our activities whatsoever.
By “illiquid” gifts of course we mean that we provide yachts and private jet travel, credit cards which need not be reported, (off the record, always, never EVER reported), country club memberships, male and female escort services for single dates and ménages a trois, quatre, cinque, six ou sept depending on the interests, preference, general “vigor” and cardiac health of the Members of Congress involved (dead reps tell no tales….) as well as pleasant and relaxing nude massages and vacations all over the world for at least one or two of the overworked and underpaid legislative staff….of every Congressman and Woman in office today, and since 1999. We make these men and women happy and loyal (to us). We are also the sponsors of the most authentic Roman Senatorial Orgies since the reign of Caligula, all in the Good Old US of A…
It doesn’t matter what we do because everything we do is wired directly to individual members of Congress and their staffs so you can’t even investigate it because of Article I, Section 6, Clause 1, unless you can get proof to the contrary, which is about as likely as anyone actually learning why Hillary is still with Bill or how many shoes Michelle has bought since becoming First Lady. (We happen to know that the public rumors of $10 million are laughably low, because we gave her that much ourselves, just in alcohol and massages….feel pity for the woman…. Remember that the man she’s married to has been alleged to be a secretly gay misogynistic murderous communist when the truth is he never made any secret about being a communist at all….) So much for express immunity…

No comments:

Post a Comment