The Question is, who wrote it?
First
General Answer to First General Question: LEGISLATIVE
IMMUNITY IMMUNIZES US BECAUSE WE OWN YOUR LEGISLATORS AND LEGISLATIVE
PROCESS
In
addressing any Constitutional question, one must always begin with
the most precisely relevant text of the Constitution.
Since
there is no precisely relevant text of the Constitution with regard
to “the killing of innocent civilians within a foreign nation”
whatsoever, we must turn to the only specific grant of immunity in
the Constitution, which clearly and generally covers all of
Respondent (Greenhills’ and Affiliates’) Conduct hereinabove
generally alleged.
Article
I, §6, Clause 1 of the Constitution of 1787, adopted by a special
Congress at the City of Philadelphia in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania in one of the 13 newly independent American States,
adopted “Parliamentary” immunity much as originally formulated in
England during the Glorious Revolution of 1689:
The Senators and
Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to
be ascertained by law, and paid out of the treasury of the United
States. They shall in all cases, except
treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest
during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses,
and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or
debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other
place.
As
you are well aware, if you have been “awake” at any time during
the past twenty-five-to-thirty years, Respondent (Green Hills) has
substantially augmented the salary received by the Senators and
Representatives paid out of the treasury of the United States by
private liquid and illiquid forms of compensation which really make
the trivial pittance paid to these fine men and women appear like the
trivial pittance it is, when compared with real money.
Furthermore,
because we have “wired” all Congressmen and women in our direct
or indirect service to our communications media at all time,
literally everything that our Congressmen and Women do at all times
concerns us. Therefore, neither we nor any of our agents or
employees in the House of Representatives (we never speak of Senators
because there are so few of them, but it goes without
saying….generally, except that we never said anything specifically)
ever do anything that is not privileged from arrest, because we are
with our Representatives at all time in their “going to and
returning from” “their attendance at the session of their
respective houses.”
Because
these Congressmen are “wired” to all our operations at all times,
not merely any but every “speech or debate in either house”
involves and concerns us, and accordingly, no one shall ever be
questioned in any other place concerning our activities, so it is, in
fact, impossible for anyone ever to determine whether our activities
are felonious, treasonous, or breaches of the peace which, of course,
they are not because we are immune, through the participation of our
legislators in our activities and of our participation in all
legislative activities, in general, through our “bribed and wired
Representatives” program.
“Bribery”
of course is not a violation of any law, arising from the Common Law,
nor any state or Federal Statute, to the degree that there will never
be any evidence, admissible or otherwise, to prove it. How stupid do
you think we are, lady? We run the whole show here….
With
regard to numbers, there are 435 members of the U.S. House of
Representatives (remember we don’t count senators, not now, not
EVER), and 53 of these come from California. It is a matter of,
well, not exactly “public record,” of course, because it’s top
secret, but certainly a matter of “general” knowledge, and after
all this is a “general question,” isn’t it? It is a matter of
general (secret) knowledge that a solid majority, 39 out of the 53
representatives from California are all on the (secret but liquid)
payroll of your Respondent (Green Hills).
With
regard to the remaining 382 Congressmen and women from other states,
Green Hills can only claim direct employment of 125 representatives
via “liquid” salaries.
However,
when you consider how many other Congressmen and women receive
illiquid gifts and services from your Respondent (Green Hills) you
will see and it is clear that we control a solid majority of the U.S.
House of Representatives, at all times sufficient to prevent any
impeachment of any executive or judicial branch officers and, quite
sufficient to quell any investigation of our activities whatsoever.
By
“illiquid” gifts of course we mean that we provide yachts and
private jet travel, credit cards which need not be reported, (off the
record, always, never EVER reported), country club memberships, male
and female escort services for single dates and ménages a trois,
quatre, cinque, six ou sept depending on the interests,
preference, general “vigor” and cardiac health of the Members of
Congress involved (dead reps tell no tales….) as well as pleasant
and relaxing nude massages and vacations all over the world for at
least one or two of the overworked and underpaid legislative
staff….of every Congressman and Woman in office today, and since
1999. We make these men and women happy and loyal (to us). We are
also the sponsors of the most authentic Roman Senatorial Orgies since
the reign of Caligula, all in the Good Old US of A…
It
doesn’t matter what we do because everything we do is wired
directly to individual members of Congress and their staffs so you
can’t even investigate it because of Article I, Section 6, Clause
1, unless you can get proof to the contrary, which is about as likely
as anyone actually learning why Hillary is still with Bill or how
many shoes Michelle has bought since becoming First Lady. (We happen
to know that the public rumors of $10 million are laughably low,
because we gave her that much ourselves, just in alcohol and
massages….feel pity for the woman…. Remember that the man she’s
married to has been alleged to be a secretly gay misogynistic
murderous communist when the truth is he never made any secret about
being a communist at all….) So much for express immunity…
No comments:
Post a Comment